Other+systems+to+classify+interventions


 * ** Article ** || ** Country ** || ** Objective ** || ** Description ** || ** Discipline ** || ** Methodology ** || ** Peer reviewed ** || ** Knowledge users ** || ** Piloted or tested ** || ** Theory based ** ||
 * Proctor 2013 [1] || USA || propose specific standards for characterizing implementation strategies in sufficient detail || 7 dimensions: actor, the action, action targets, temporality, dose, implementation outcomes, and theoretical justification || health || not reported || y || no || no || no ||
 * Greenhalgh 2004 [2] || UK || summary of the findings of a systematic literature review of the diffusion of service innovations, focused on health literature || conceptual model for considering determinants of diffusion, dissemination, and implementation of innovations in health service delivery and organization; constructs in the model in Figure 3 can be used to describe interventions (e.g. systems readiness, implementation process, etc.); intended as a memory aid for considering the different aspects of a complex situation and their many interactions || general || literature review || yes || no || no || no ||
 * Keller 2004 [3] || USA || introduces the revised Intervention Wheel and the evidence linking it to practice || Intervention Wheel with 3 levels of practice (community, systems, and individual/family) and 17 public health interventions. || public health || literature review, expert panel || yes || yes || yes || no ||
 * Ward 2010 [4] || UK || to produce a template to help researchers, practitioners and decision makers plan and evaluate initiatives for transferring knowledge into action || 5 elements in the knowledge transfer process; identifying and communicating about the problem which the knowledge needs to address; analyzing the context which surrounds the producers and users of knowledge; developing and selecting the knowledge to be transferred; selecting specific knowledge transfer activities or interventions; considering how the knowledge will be used in practice. || general || literature review, fieldwork, revising || yes || yes || yes || no ||
 * Nuffeld 2007 [5] || UK || describes different kinds of intervention that may be used to promote public health by public authorities on an ‘intervention ladder’, from the least to the most coercive or intrusive measures || proposed intervention ladder from the least to the most coercive or intrusive measures: Do nothing or simply monitor the current situation; Provide information; Enable choice; Guide choices through changing the default policy; Guide choices through incentives; Guide choice through disincentives; Restrict choice || public health || not reported || no || no || no || no ||

Reference List 1. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen CJ: **Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting.** //Implement Sci// 2013, **8:** 139. 2. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O: **Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.** //Milbank Q// 2004, **82:** 581-629. 3. Keller LO, Strohschein S, Lia-Hoagberg B, Schaffer MA: **Population-based public health interventions: practice-based and evidence-supported. Part I.** //Public Health Nurs// 2004, **21:** 453-468. 4. Ward V, Smith S, Carruthers S, Hamer S, House A. Knowledge brokering: Exploring the process of transferring knowledge into action. 2010. UK, University of Leeds. 5. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Public health: ethical issues: a guide to the report. 2007. Nuffield Council on Bioethics.